Posted by
Mike on Sunday, May 03, 2009 7:37:11 PM
http://westernperspective.blogspot.com/
The Supreme Court abortion decisions beginning in January, 1973 have had a noticeable demographic effect. From the outset, the long term effect was to take away the rights of fathers which polarized white males politically for self-defense. At the time of these decisions, all of the Supreme Court Justices were males and all but one were white. As with Affirmative Action and Equal Opportunity, there is a clear pattern of disenfranchisement of a generation of younger white males by older white males abusing their power, as mentioned earlier
herein. This was probably due to post-War hubris and gloating over the crushing of Japan with the atomic bomb, and other killing of civilians in Europe by the Allied Powers. The sins of the fathers are thus being passed down to the next generation as one might expect.
The last of these justices on the high court was Chief Justice William Rehnquist, a staunch abortion opponent and dissenter from the first abortion decisions.
Those Americans under 36 years of age were born after the court decisions. Many of them grew up without brothers, sisters and friends who were legally killed by abortion. It is a well known fact that all family members suffer because of miscarriages in the family. Logically, there is greater cause for alarm within a family when a mother deliberately kills her child legally. The effect is a subconscious underlying distrust of the mother, along with justifiable anger and resentment toward the powers that be, i.e. the government.
We know, for example, that Timothy McVeigh, although he was born before the court decisions, came from a broken home and that his mother selfishly chose to place her personal comfort level above the good of the family.
Demographically, the pro-life majority is being made up of white male disenfranchised baby-boomer dads together with all Americans conceived in 1973 or thereafter. This consensus is formed through a process of realization and awareness of the wrongs done primarily by white males during the turbulent post-War years.
Without seeking retribution, this new majority is demanding an accounting for the lives lost. The economic dislocations and foreign policy debacles of the first three baby-boomer presidencies represent the first stage of the process. Bringing the culprits to justice will initiate the process of redress, healing and reconciliation.
How will this be accomplished? Ideally, the Supreme Court will exercise original jurisdiction, issue subpoenas, and conduct an investigation of its own into government wrongdoing. Americans must never allow this process to degenerate into vigilantism.
If the Supreme Court refuses to act, the majority of citizens will be forced to seek redress from the World Court of the United Nations to indict the wrongdoers within our government and those who have already left government. If they refuse to cooperate, it will be up to the individual states to enforce compliance with the will of the people.