About Me

Loading...

Create Your Own Blog Find Other Townhall Blogs

Comments

Archives

Blog Roll

 

The Time Is Now

http://westernperspective.blogspot.com/

Sonia Sotomayor's pathetic confirmation hearings typify everything that is wrong with America. Judges including Sotomayor use as an excuse for withholding or denying justice that they are just applying the law as though law were some abstract mathematical construct. Does Sotomayor think that she is fooling the American people? Does she think that it is funny that hard working firefighters have to jump through legal hoops to obtain justice because judges like her don't care about justice, but only follow a skewed and exaggerated interpretation of precedent? Before judges can even comprehend what precedent means they must have a firm grasp of the particular civilization of which these cases are only a reflection. Being outside of the cultural mainstream, they have no depth and can only add wrong precedent. The Supreme Court did not change precedent in ruling against Sotomayor and the other appellate court justices. The lower court did not know what it was doing, or they deliberately chose to deny justice to American citizens.

Senator Dodd boasts that he and his colleagues have excessively exquisite health care at essentially zero cost, while everyone outside the federal system must pay both taxes and insurance premiums for substandard, costly job-related medical coverage. I suppose Dodd thinks it's a big joke that he and his ilk in government are giving people outside the mainstream free health care and using them as a club against the majority in society, and acting as though they don't get that killing has consequences.

Well we have got news for you Chris Dodd. All groups of people outside the mainstream of society are there for a reason. They are the people whose time has already come and gone. The future of America belongs to those who stand up for truth. Stop spending our tax money to kill babies, Senators. Stop playing around.

Sarah Palin is hated by the liberal boneheads because she represents mainstream America. There will be a just accounting for each and every arrogant mistake, rebuff, and injustice taking for granted the majority of American citizens. The minorities outside the mainstream have been allowed sufficient time to show whether they are loyal or disloyal. We have allowed fools to run the show for too long and it is time for a day of reckoning in which the power of the majority will have to be used to the extent necessary to bring minorities into the mainstream, or if they still choose to destroy the majority, they will end up destroying themselves. Our patience is at an end.

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Jackson Offspring Should Go to Next of Kin

http://westernperspective.blogspot/

As shown in the picture at right taken on November 27, 2008, Michael Jackson's three children bear a strong resemblance to their father. Michael Joseph Jackson Jr. is pictured on the left, Paris Michael Katherine in the center, and Michael II at bottom of photograph. Obviously they have a darker complexion than the two other children who are unrelated. It is often the case that children of a white mother and a black father have a skin color somewhat in between. Each of the children also has brown eyes, with the daughter's being a lighter color.

Deborah Rowe contends that she is the biological mother of the two oldest Jackson children, and that they were both conceived through artificial insemination. Whether or not this was done in vitro is still an open question. Michael Jackson has stated in an interview that he is the biological father of the youngest child also conceived through artificial insemination, the mother being unknown.

Deborah Rowe and Michael Jackson were married on November 14, 1996 while Deborah was pregnant with the first child and remained married until after the second child was born. There is a presumption in California that the biological mother is the mother of the child at the time of birth, and since both children were born during the marriage, they shared custody of both children until the marriage ended in divorce on October 8, 1999.   The presumption that the biological mother should have custody is rebutted by the fact that Deborah Rowe bore both children to term for the motive of financial gain, and the fact that marriage was apparently never consummated.

The daughter Paris Michael Katherine shares one name with her grandmother Katherine Jackson. Michael Jackson clearly intended in his will that Mrs. Jackson should have full custody of all of the children, and that Diana Ross should have custody only if Mrs. Jackson was unable or unwilling to care for the children. He also intentionally omitted to provide for his former spouse Deborah Rowe. To give custody of the two oldest of the children to one guardian and the youngest child to another guardian would unnecessarily break up the family.

Under these circumstances, the court should grant Katherine Jackson full custody of the three children, with some visitation rights allowed for Deborah Rowe and the two oldest children only.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Dèjá Vu All Over Again?

http://westernperspective.blogspot.com/

As the Jackson saga continues to unfold, it is beginning to look like maybe the doctor and the nurse cooked up the idea of providing children so as to be able, in addition to bilking him out of money for needless and destructive plastic surgery, to then fraudulently assert after his death that the nurse was in fact the biological mother and that DNA tests will prove this to be the case. It will then come down to a question à la Anna Nicole Smith of whether the biological parent is entitled to custody, giving access to some control over the sizable inheritance as happened with Larry Birkhead. Can we expect many of the same cast of characters including lawyers Stacy Phillips and Debra Opri in this ongoing soap opera drama?

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Surrogacy, In-Vitro, Stem Cells, Cloning. . .What Next?

http://westernperspective.blogspot.com/

The problems raised by Michael Jackson's estate bring to the fore the complete lack of foresight bringing about chaos through liberal ideology. The three children in question were all apparently conceived in vitro, the first two carried to term by Jackson's ex-wife Deborah Rowe, as a surrogate or "breeder", the third having been carried to term by an unknown surrogate. The legality of all of this is highly questionable. If a couple or individual can pay a "fertility clinic" to manufacture embryos and/or implant preexisting embryos into the womb of the contracting spouse or individual, or another surrogate unrelated to the contracting parties, what is there to prevent women from getting pregnant as "surrogates" for others with no intention whatsoever of raising their offspring in a healthy environment? Is this not the equivalent of slavery? The very acts of in vitro fertilization and implantation cause injury and harm to the child to be conceived and born by depriving that child of a God-given right to be conceived through a loving marital act. This is not a right devised by man, and it cannot be abrogated by man. The participants also harm themselves, particularly the man who provides the seed for conception through a deliberate act contrary to his own male nature.

Since these children are harmed from the gate, should we allow any of the contracting parties to have custody of the children? The children have already been exploited as a means to an end by the adults involved including doctors and fertility clinic operators. Should we now add insult to injury by giving custody to one or more adults who are in pari delicto and who have caused this injury? We see the results of taking this approach in the way Jackson treated the youngest boy by dangling him over a balcony in a Berlin hotel with face covered, and the child being then given the derogatory nickname "Blanket" which will probably stick for the end of his life.

In order to stop these terrible practices, our courts will have to rethink the entire notion of "reproductive rights", including the question of whether prospective rights exist for all human beings which precede conception and are above the state and man-made law. Only then will we be able to protect these rights for everyone.

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive
« Previous1Next »